On June 22, 2022 2:54:28 AM UTC, John Levine wrote:
>It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>>Not confusing is indeed the tricky part. I think what's wanted is shortest
>>that's longer than the longest PSD.
>
>How about this?
>
>b.a psd=y
>c.b.a NXDOMAIN
>d.c.b.a blah
>
>What's the org domai
It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>Not confusing is indeed the tricky part. I think what's wanted is shortest
>that's longer than the longest PSD.
How about this?
b.a psd=y
c.b.a NXDOMAIN
d.c.b.a blah
What's the org domain for e.d.c.b.a? I think it's c.b.a. Is the policy
domain is d.
I haven't seen discussion about this, here. Apologies if I missed it
somewhere.
If DMARC evaluation at receivers is updated to allow determination of
alignment via tree walk, the XML reporting data sent using that scheme
needs to reflect this.
Even if a consensus is reached wherein PSL use is dep
On June 22, 2022 2:11:56 AM UTC, John Levine wrote:
>It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>>As written, I think it produces the correct result.
>
>I now think it's close but not quite.
>
>>As written you take the domain with a (non-PSD) DMARC record with the fewest
>>labels,
>
>How abo
It appears that Scott Kitterman said:
>As written, I think it produces the correct result.
I now think it's close but not quite.
>As written you take the domain with a (non-PSD) DMARC record with the fewest
>labels,
How about this?
a NXDOMAIN (or psd=y, doesn't matter)
b.a blah
c.b.a ps
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 7:42:01 PM EDT John R Levine wrote:
> I've been staring at the tree walk description and see a few places where
> it could be clearer, and one place where I think it's wrong, left over
> text from the old downward walk.
>
> If this discussion isn't clear enough I can do a
I've been staring at the tree walk description and see a few places where
it could be clearer, and one place where I think it's wrong, left over
text from the old downward walk.
If this discussion isn't clear enough I can do a pull request with the
proposed changes.
In the description of the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 1:08 PM John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Todd Herr said:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >The main differences between this rev and rev-07 are the ABNF updates and
> >the addition of a discussion in section 9.7 on the topic of "Determination
> >of the Organizational Domain for
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting
& Conformance WG of the IETF.
Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
Conformance (DMARC)
It appears that Todd Herr said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>The main differences between this rev and rev-07 are the ABNF updates and
>the addition of a discussion in section 9.7 on the topic of "Determination
>of the Organizational Domain for Relaxed Alignment".
I found a few mistakes in the ABNF, all my f
The main differences between this rev and rev-07 are the ABNF updates and
the addition of a discussion in section 9.7 on the topic of "Determination
of the Organizational Domain for Relaxed Alignment".
The next rev, which I hope to publish in the next couple weeks, will
include a discussion of the
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting
& Conformance WG of the IETF.
Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
Conformance (DMARC)
On Tuesday, June 21, 2022 7:02:12 AM EDT Douglas Foster wrote:
> Before we move to coding the similarities, differences, and risks into the
> document, it would be useful just to generate a complete list within this
> WG.
>
> It would certainly be a breach of trust to omit information from the
> d
Before we move to coding the similarities, differences, and risks into the
document, it would be useful just to generate a complete list within this
WG.
It would certainly be a breach of trust to omit information from the
document, if done for the purpose of hiding tree walk limitations.
Doug
On
14 matches
Mail list logo
