[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-12.txt

2022-07-06 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF. Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC)

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-12.txt

2022-07-06 Thread Todd Herr
This new revision contains a rewrite of the "Domain Existence Test" section, along with moving it back to its original location in Appendix A. The rewrite was done in response to the realization that the text in previous revs was inaccurate in its claims about RFC 7489. On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 10:

Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment

2022-07-06 Thread Douglas Foster
Yes, PSD is still the appropriate term for a PSO-controlled domain. We need an additional definition for a "Private Registry Domain" (optionally "PRD" if we want to create another acronym.) Collectively, PSDs and PRDs are "registry domains". We intend to use a single DNS token for both PSD an

[dmarc-ietf] Friends of Email dinner in Philadelphia, Thursday July 28 at 7:30pm

2022-07-06 Thread Bron Gondwana
Hopefully I've hit the key working groups where those who are friends of email (or email-adjacent stuff like calendars and contacts) are lurking. This coming IETF just happens to be in one of the very few cities where Fastmail has a presence (actually, it's something about this year! We have s

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-12.txt

2022-07-06 Thread John Levine
It appears that Todd Herr said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >This new revision contains a rewrite of the "Domain Existence Test" >section, along with moving it back to its original location in Appendix A. > >The rewrite was done in response to the realization that the text in >previous revs was inaccurate in