I am starting from the viewpoint that (a) reporting is a courtesy provided
by the evaluator to the domain owner, and (b) the evaluator will do so in
the context of his own interest, which includes filtering messages with
maximum possible efficiency.
This WG can certainly impose a requirement that
On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 2:01 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In many cases, an evaluator can determine a DMARC PASS result
> without evaluating every available identifier.
>
>- If a message has SPF PASS with acceptable alignment, the evaluator
>has no need
In many cases, an evaluator can determine a DMARC PASS result
without evaluating every available identifier.
- If a message has SPF PASS with acceptable alignment, the evaluator has
no need to evaluate any DKIM signatures to know that the message produces
DMARC PASS.
- Some
On Sat 01/Oct/2022 15:03:26 +0200 Brotman, Alex wrote:
[Ticket 120] was addressed in 04, let us know if you believe otherwise, or not
sufficiently.
That was the addition of Section 2.1.3 "Unique Identifiers in Aggregate
Reporting". So in order to match reality, we should lower requirements
