On Friday, March 10, 2023 6:12:45 PM EST Steven M Jones wrote:
> On 3/10/23 3:08 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> > although I'm back as an editor of the failure reporting I-D, that file
> > is almost final and I can't think of anything to be discussed live
> > about it. I haven't registered for
On 3/10/23 3:08 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
although I'm back as an editor of the failure reporting I-D, that file
is almost final and I can't think of anything to be discussed live
about it. I haven't registered for 116.
Off the top of my head, and in light of the aggregate reports
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 3:45 PM John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Barry Leiba said:
> >Document authors definitely NEED TO weigh in. Others, please also
> >raise any issues you want to discuss, or make a case for cancelling
> >the session.
>
> I can't think of any issues with dmarcbis that
It appears that Barry Leiba said:
>Document authors definitely NEED TO weigh in. Others, please also
>raise any issues you want to discuss, or make a case for cancelling
>the session.
I can't think of any issues with dmarcbis that would be worth a
meeting. I think it's ready for last call and
Hi,
although I'm back as an editor of the failure reporting I-D, that file is
almost final and I can't think of anything to be discussed live about it. I
haven't registered for 116.
Best
Ale
On Fri 10/Mar/2023 02:51:56 +0100 Barry Leiba wrote:
We do have a session scheduled for IETF 116.
