Re: [dmarc-ietf] Solving DMARC damage with User quarantine and Steram-Info tag

2023-04-03 Thread Jesse Thompson
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023, at 8:30 PM, Douglas Foster wrote: > I described my algorithm because I am surprised that some of these > sub-optimal filtering problems exist. I would have thought the DKIM domain to be a better authenticated identifier than MailFrom domain; messages from ESPs are typically

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Solving DMARC damage with User quarantine and Steram-Info tag

2023-04-03 Thread Douglas Foster
I described my algorithm because I am surprised that some of these sub-optimal filtering problems exist. As a corollary: In an American bar, the bouncer checks I.Ds. on the way in, so that the bartender does not have to check IDs on every drink. Similarly, I assume that a major ESP has

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Solving DMARC damage with User quarantine and Steram-Info tag

2023-04-03 Thread Jesse Thompson
On Sat, Apr 1, 2023, at 9:41 PM, Douglas Foster wrote: > My approach to ESP traffic is simple. I assume that the ESP has authorized > the account indicated by the From address, so I don't worry about Sender > Authentication as long as the message passes SPF based on the ESP domain. > DMARC