Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signatures

2023-05-02 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 10:06 AM John Levine wrote: > No large provider has ever expressed any interest in either so I cannot > see any reason to spend more time on either one. > I believe Wei has expressed interest in the transforms stuff, but I don't recall whether that was a commitment to impl

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signatures

2023-05-02 Thread John Levine
It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy said: >And I think the conditional signatures ideas suffer from the same two >issues I identified above. It's not quite as bad because with conditional signatures you can decide for each message if any third party signatures are OK. That mostly solves the secu

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Third party signatures

2023-05-02 Thread Wei Chuang
On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 8:23 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Some thoughts about the third party signature discussion that happened > over the last couple of weeks while I was away: > > I wrote ATPS as an experiment in 2012. At the time we were still > finishing DKIM (RFC 6376 was only five month

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-11.txt

2023-05-02 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Tue 02/May/2023 15:17:09 +0200 Brotman, Alex wrote: Otherwise, whitespace changes. The effect on ABNFs is horrible. We have dmarc-subject = %x52.65.70.6f.72.74 1*FWS ; "Report" %x44.6f.6d.61.69.6e.3a 1*FWS ; "Domain:" domain-name 1*FWS ; from RFC 6376 %x53.75.62.6d.69.74.74.65.72

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-11.txt

2023-05-02 Thread Brotman, Alex
One other thing I forgot to note is that there are no longer any open "issues" attached to this document (in Github at least). -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -Original Message- > From: dmarc On Behalf Of Brotman, Alex > Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-11.txt

2023-05-02 Thread Brotman, Alex
That was the core of the change. Also no longer malicious Domain Owner. Otherwise, whitespace changes. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -Original Message- > From: dmarc On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman > Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:13 AM > To: dmarc@i

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-11.txt

2023-05-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, May 2, 2023 9:00:54 AM EDT internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message > Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF. > >Title

[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-11.txt

2023-05-02 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF. Title : DMARC Aggregate Reporting Author : Alex Brotman Filen