On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 6:34 AM Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Murray S. Kucherawy writes:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:34 PM Tero Kivinen wrote:
> >
> > DKIM failures
> >
>
> > 36.34% 26619 invalid DKIM record
On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 5:33:50 PM EDT Tero Kivinen wrote:
> Barry Leiba writes:
> > > DKIM only: ~99.5%
> > > DKIM + SPF: ~100%
> > > SPF only: ~100%
> >
> > That's interesting and disturbing if it remains consistent.
>
> The statistics I have are quite different. The failure rate is much
>
Tero Kivinen writes:
> > What are those 0.75%, some 30k SPF - DKIM messages? Are there
> > cases of DKIM random failure salvaged by SPF?
>
> My current analysis script does not try to calculate that, I would
> need to need to add that step there and rerun the script. If I
> understand correctly
Alessandro Vesely writes:
> On Tue 13/Jun/2023 23:33:50 +0200 Tero Kivinen wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > As you can see 85.75% of incoming email was already signed by DKIM,
> > and 86.5% of emails had SPF records that passed. So they both have
> > about same amount if usage coming in to our servers.
>
Murray S. Kucherawy writes:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:34 PM Tero Kivinen wrote:
>
> DKIM failures
>
> 36.34% 26619 invalid DKIM record
>
> This is staggering. Can you characterize what
