Re: [dmarc-ietf] Another p=reject text proposal

2023-08-13 Thread Jesse Thompson
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023, at 11:48 AM, John Levine wrote: > It appears that Jesse Thompson said: > >> This of course requires that the recipient SMTP server can't simply > >> reject the incoming email after the MAIL FROM because SPF checks do > >> not match, they actually need to receive the email

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposal for auth policy tag in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis

2023-08-13 Thread Wei Chuang
I've also tried rolling up the comments in this thread as well. Below is the result: -Wei = 1. Introduction, 3rd paragraph insert after first sentence: In addition, the choice of permitted authentication methods, SPF or DKIM, method MAY be explicitly specified, potentially to restrict the

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Proposal for additional Security Considerations for SPF Upgrade in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis

2023-08-13 Thread Wei Chuang
I've tried to roll up the guidance in this thread in the results below. -Wei = 11.9 Quarantined Forwarded Mail Security Risk When receivers apply the "MUST NOT reject" in Section 8.6 to accept unauthenticated messages as quarantined messages, receivers ought to carefully review how they

[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Aug 13 06:00:03 2023

2023-08-13 Thread John Levine
Count| Bytes | Who ++--- 24 ( 100%) | 187014 ( 100%) | Total 4 (16.7%) | 45854 (24.5%) | Wei Chuang 4 (16.7%) | 27867 (14.9%) | Scott Kitterman 4 (16.7%) | 23388 (12.5%) | Alessandro Vesely 3 (12.5%) | 15572 ( 8.3%) | John Levine