Re: [dmarc-ietf] Policy Enforcement Considerations

2023-09-20 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Tue 19/Sep/2023 19:55:02 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 8:24 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: My wording can certainly be improved. Before denying the idea, please consider a couple of facts: >> 1) We want ARC to override DMARC, yet we don't say so. Not in such a way

[dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Draft

2023-09-20 Thread Brotman, Alex
Hey folks, It feels like we're sort of getting near the end of work on the core document (maybe that's the optimist speaking), so I thought I'd see if there are any known issues with the aggregate reporting draft [1]. I believe I had previously addressed or closed all tickets and addressed kno

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Draft

2023-09-20 Thread A. Schulze
Am 20.09.23 um 21:56 schrieb Brotman, Alex: 1: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/ Hello Alex, Section 6.4 use the abbreviations "PSO" and "PSD" I know, PSD = public suffix domain, but was lost with PSO Ok, using a search engine I found RFC 9091 and learned:

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Draft

2023-09-20 Thread Barry Leiba
Thanks for this, Alex. I will start a working group last call on this late next week, so if anyone knows of a reason to hold off on that, please post something by next Wednesday, 27 September. Of course, issues can be raised during WGLC, so Barry On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 12:56 PM Brotman, Al