On 03/04/2019 21:19, Jothan Frakes wrote:
>> ... registrar
>> GUIs are perhaps the main barrier for new RRTYPEs ...
>
> s/registrar/DNS Management/
>
> these are often not one in the same - and the only reason I make that
> pedantic distinction is that the frequent situation where
> DNS
Far from widely deployed, but the latest ESNI draft introduced a
new RRTYPE from an experimental range, and it "just worked," which
was a pleasant surprise for me. (And is partly why I am happy to
try that route for RDBD.)
"just worked" here meaning: no registrar web-GUI involved, but
whacking
Noting again that my comments are non-blocking (so you
should feel free to ignore me:-), but ...
On 22/06/16 06:08, Kurt Andersen wrote:
>> > - I think the abstract and intro would be better if they
>> > explicitly ack'd that DMARC affects mailing lists. . .
> While mailing lists can be
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dmarc-interoperability-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
