~5%. This high may just represent some level of attack this month.
> Nevertheless, of the accepted mail, we have a relatively high spam mail
> rate.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Hector Santos,https://santronics.comhttps://winserver.com
>
>
>
> On 6/16/2023 10:24 AM, Steve S
Below is a table of SPF/DKIM/DMARC statuses over the past 30 days on our
inbound MX servers (umn.edu and several *.umn.edu domains). Note that we
employ a DMARC policy of p=reject; also note that we have split our dmarc
'fail' status into three categories:
*fail* indicates a DMARC failure where t
After reading this thread, I couldn't help but wonder about how the
addition of a "PSD flag" specifically targeted to DMARC might be repurposed
for other non-DMARC applications since my understanding is that the PSL is
currently being used for other purposes as well. Just food for thought.
___
At the University of Minnesota we used p=quarantine,pct=0 as a transition
between p=none and p=quarantine,pct=100 as it causes header "From:" to be
rewritten on DMARC-aware mailing list servers. I agree with Laura Atkins
that removing pct=0 will make DMARC implementation more difficult for some
or
