In article you write:
>> The bar for ARC to be usable is pretty low. It's not "doesn't send
>> spam" or even "knows who its users are." It's only "doesn't lie about
>> where mail came from." I expect that in practice the usual DNSBLs
>> will be good enough.
>
>Is the assumption with ARC, when it
On 10/6/20 10:20 AM, John Levine wrote:
> In article <1265372281.9984.1601969016...@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> you
> write:
>> It would be much better if there were a few professional/community efforts
>> to build reliable and complete lists of good
>> and bad ARC intermediaries, like for spa
In article <1265372281.9984.1601969016...@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> you
write:
> It would be much better if there were a few professional/community efforts to
> build reliable and complete lists of good
> and bad ARC intermediaries, like for spam.
Having tried and failed to build a whitelis
