Re: [dmarc-ietf] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-05: (with COMMENT)

2019-04-10 Thread John Levine
In article <155486669171.19715.14014281020759221500.idtrac...@ietfa.amsl.com> you write: >I agree with Benjamin's DISCUSS comment: this document needs to better >explain the consequences of the inability to match %{s} and %{l}. It has no consequences at all. As Scott noted, it documents what the

[dmarc-ietf] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-05: (with COMMENT)

2019-04-09 Thread Adam Roach via Datatracker
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth-05: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ie