Re: [dmarc-ietf] Clarification about data integrity within Aggregate Reports (Ticket #40)

2021-01-05 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Mon 04/Jan/2021 16:53:20 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote: -Original Message- From: dmarc On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely On Wed 30/Dec/2020 23:18:35 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote: There's an open ticket (https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/40) noting that we should clarify what constitut

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Clarification about data integrity within Aggregate Reports (Ticket #40)

2021-01-04 Thread Brotman, Alex
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast > -Original Message- > From: dmarc On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely > Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2020 10:27 AM > To: dmarc@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Clarification about data integri

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Clarification about data integrity within Aggregate Reports (Ticket #40)

2020-12-31 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Wed 30/Dec/2020 23:18:35 +0100 Brotman, Alex wrote: Hello folks, There's an open ticket (https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/40) noting that we should clarify what constitutes valid data in a report. For example, the report cannot state that DMARC-DKIM was a "pass" when DKIM itself was

[dmarc-ietf] Clarification about data integrity within Aggregate Reports (Ticket #40)

2020-12-30 Thread Brotman, Alex
Hello folks, There's an open ticket (https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/40) noting that we should clarify what constitutes valid data in a report. For example, the report cannot state that DMARC-DKIM was a "pass" when DKIM itself was a failure. See the original thread here: https://maila