Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC PSD and non-existent subdomains

2019-06-11 Thread Hector Santos
On 6/11/2019 11:38 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote: On Tue 11/Jun/2019 00:41:16 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: On Monday, June 10, 2019 8:07:25 AM EDT Richard C wrote: Presumably other PSDs that aren’t brand new will have this problem too? I’m interested to hear whether we’re on our own or not. As

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC PSD and non-existent subdomains

2019-06-11 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Tue 11/Jun/2019 00:41:16 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, June 10, 2019 8:07:25 AM EDT Richard C wrote: > >> Presumably other PSDs that aren’t brand new will have this problem too? I’m >> interested to hear whether we’re on our own or not. > > As written, DMARC (RFC 7489) has the opt

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC PSD and non-existent subdomains

2019-06-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, June 10, 2019 8:07:25 AM EDT Richard C wrote: > Thanks for the question, Seth. > What would be the best way to incorporate this requirement? > The simplest possible way to address this use case is just to make sure > those existing but currently non-compliant domains just have a bare p=n

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC PSD and non-existent subdomains

2019-06-10 Thread Richard C
Thanks for the question, Seth. What would be the best way to incorporate this requirement? The simplest possible way to address this use case is just to make sure those existing but currently non-compliant domains just have a bare p=none record. Then they'll never fall back to the gov.uk

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC PSD and non-existent subdomains

2019-05-30 Thread Seth Blank
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:06 AM Richard C wrote: > What would be the best way to incorporate this requirement? > The simplest possible way to address this use case is just to make sure those existing but currently non-compliant domains just have a bare p=none record. Then they'll never fall back

[dmarc-ietf] DMARC PSD and non-existent subdomains

2019-05-30 Thread Richard C
Hello At the National Cyber Security Centre in the UK we're supportive of the PSD DMARC initiative. However, we currently have one problem that would hamper its applicability to our use case: We essentially have the need to express different subdomain policies to existing and non-existing domai