Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts?

2024-03-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, March 7, 2024 8:55:55 AM EDT Todd Herr wrote: > On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:08 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > On 06/03/2024 21:00, Todd Herr wrote: > > > Section 4.7, DMARC Policy Discovery, starts with the following sentence: > > > For policy discovery, a DNS Tree Walk starts at th

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts?

2024-03-07 Thread Todd Herr
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:08 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote: > On 06/03/2024 21:00, Todd Herr wrote: > > > > Section 4.7, DMARC Policy Discovery, starts with the following sentence: > > > > For policy discovery, a DNS Tree Walk starts at the domain found in > > the RFC5322.From header of the m

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts?

2024-03-07 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On 06/03/2024 21:00, Todd Herr wrote: Section 4.7, DMARC Policy Discovery, starts with the following sentence: For policy discovery, a DNS Tree Walk starts at the domain found in the RFC5322.From header of the message being evaluated. I think the above is muddy, [...] When it comes to

[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts?

2024-03-06 Thread Todd Herr
Colleagues, Murray's post on RFC 7489 errata got me thinking that some language associated with the Tree Walk could stand a bit more clarity. Section 4.7, DMARC Policy Discovery, starts with the following sentence: For policy discovery, a DNS Tree Walk starts at the domain found in the RFC5322.F