It appears that Todd Herr said:
>As for law enforcement, I don't see "Officer, that unknown guy over there
>did something bad, and I can't show you direct evidence of it, you're just
>gonna have to trust me when I say he did it X times" as a motivator,
>especially if the bad guy is likely to be
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 5:45 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Quantities
> --
> I can see that FAIL quantities could be useful for motivating law
> enforcement. It has the advantage of installed code and relatively little
> processing cost.
>
I don't
Quantities
--
I can see that FAIL quantities could be useful for motivating law
enforcement. It has the advantage of installed code and relatively little
processing cost. But to Murray's specific questions:
Yes, reporting quantity 1 is an inconsistency with the specification.
This
The worst case is a little worse than doubling the traffic. Consider the
case that global traffic consists of N messages. It may happen that they
are all for different pairs. In that
case we have N aggregate reports, for 2N global traffic.
It can be a little worse than that if we
So we want to skip sending success reports, without indication of quantity?
That already exists and is called failure reporting.
Best
Ale
On Sun 11/Dec/2022 21:21:20 +0100 Douglas Foster wrote:
I would not want to use randomization or percentages to discard actionable
data.,
1) When
On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 12:21 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2) What to include in reports
> I have one reporting source that always reports a message count of 1,
> without regard to the number of messages that I sent and he received.
>
Perhaps I'm
Success reports and message count can give empirical evidence of a
domain's mail flow health in most situations as far as implementation
and monitoring goes, but there are circumstances that can cause data
correlation from from this information to be less useful.
Anecdotal example -
I would not want to use randomization or percentages to discard actionable
data.,
1) When to send reports.
An actionable result is one which says "this server sent a message
without a verifiable and aligned DKIM signature".This applies because:
- Any message can be subject to forwarding, so
Mike,
> You clearly don't know what you are talking about.
That's not an appropriate thing to say, and the rest of your message
stands fine without it. Please avoid these kinds of statements.
Barry, as chair.
___
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 1:59 AM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 1) DMARC was a successful 2-company experiment, which was turned into a
> widely implemented informational RFP. We are now writing the
> standards-track version of that concept. We hope that
Adding clarification since I forgot to specify - this would be
per-sender per-source. Not a set percentage of all mail received from a
source, that obviously would not work as intended.
On 12/8/2022 6:52 AM, Mark Alley wrote:
This may have been thought of before, so forgive the potentially
This may have been thought of before, so forgive the potentially
duplicate idea, I was musing earlier about feedback reporting based on a
percent of the overall mail per-source. I'm thinking of something
similar in concept to the pct= tag for published policy.
This would reduce the overhead
1) DMARC was a successful 2-company experiment, which was turned into a
widely implemented informational RFP. We are now writing the
standards-track version of that concept. We hope that Standards Track will
provide the basis for significantly increased adoption. This seems the
appropriate
I'm super unclear what you're talking about.
https://dmarc.org/2022/03/dmarc-policies-up-84-for-2021/
Aggregate reporting is used by the largest volume senders on earth, and the
vast majority of mail received by mailbox providers comes with a dmarc
record and reporting address attached.
This is
I began wondering if Aggregate Reporting works only because DMARC has been
embraced by a small portion of domain owners.
1) Is Aggregate Reporting a significant portion of all mail? In some
cases, Yes.
My organization's data:
Inbound volume is 11 times greater than my outbound volume.
Inbound
15 matches
Mail list logo
