On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 7:02 PM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:42 AM Todd Herr 40valimail@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> The text reported in the erratum doesn't really exist in DMARCbis; it's
>> been replaced by the DNS Tree Walk (
>>
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 11:42 AM Todd Herr wrote:
> The text reported in the erratum doesn't really exist in DMARCbis; it's
> been replaced by the DNS Tree Walk (
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30.html#name-dns-tree-walk
> )
>
> Are we to issue an actual update to RFC
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 1:10 PM Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> Since we're in WGLC here, this erratum is worth consideration. I've
> recommended "Held For Document Update" as the disposition.
>
> My reply to the erratum was:
>
> ===
>
> The algorithm as presented is correct, but I understand this
Since we're in WGLC here, this erratum is worth consideration. I've
recommended "Held For Document Update" as the disposition.
My reply to the erratum was:
===
The algorithm as presented is correct, but I understand this report.
The steps are, paraphrased:
(1) Go get a set of things.
(2)
