On Tuesday, February 05, 2019 08:59:17 PM John Levine wrote:
> In article <6596039.Rh8MxG5e5K@kitterma-e6430> you write:
> >The current PSL is over 12K lines long. What we're talking about here is
> >probably .1% to 1% that size.
>
> Indeed, but since everyone has the PSL anyway to find organizat
In article <6596039.Rh8MxG5e5K@kitterma-e6430> you write:
>The current PSL is over 12K lines long. What we're talking about here is
>probably .1% to 1% that size.
Indeed, but since everyone has the PSL anyway to find organizational
domains, who cares about the size? The point of asking the PSL
On Friday, January 18, 2019 04:14:42 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 01:50:18 PM John Levine wrote:
> > In article <3104294.rU99Ex2XNH@kitterma-e6430> you write:
> > >My understanding is that, since, as you say, PSOs (like .bank) have a
> > >pre-
> > >existing relationship
On Thursday, January 17, 2019 01:50:18 PM John Levine wrote:
> In article <3104294.rU99Ex2XNH@kitterma-e6430> you write:
> >My understanding is that, since, as you say, PSOs (like .bank) have a pre-
> >existing relationship with their registrants, they don't need PSD DMARC to
> >audit their registr
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:41 PM Kurt Andersen wrote:
> What is the difference between a PS vs a PSD in your statement? For the
> DNS a record is a record is a record.
>
Specifically, there are some domains (like .brand in my example) that
should be capable of being used as an organizational dom
What is the difference between a PS vs a PSD in your statement? For the DNS
a record is a record is a record.
--Kurt
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 11:26 Seth Blank On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:50 AM John Levine wrote:
>
>> I wonder if there's any way to get the PSL to tag vanity TLDs.
>>
>
> I believe a
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:50 AM John Levine wrote:
> I wonder if there's any way to get the PSL to tag vanity TLDs.
>
I believe a single list is the best long term solution. It just needs the
domain and two flags, one for if the domain is a public suffix, and the
other is if its a public suffix
In article <3104294.rU99Ex2XNH@kitterma-e6430> you write:
>My understanding is that, since, as you say, PSOs (like .bank) have a pre-
>existing relationship with their registrants, they don't need PSD DMARC to
>audit their registrant's policies. For an entity like that, it offers the
>chance to
On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 07:49:17 PM John Levine wrote:
> In article <5126347.eOcQ2jtf8Q@kitterma-e6430> you write:
> >This update removes the IANA registry (which is what I think I was supposed
> >to do based on the feedback to date). I also bulked up the
> >Privacy/Security considerations de
In article <5126347.eOcQ2jtf8Q@kitterma-e6430> you write:
>This update removes the IANA registry (which is what I think I was supposed to
>do based on the feedback to date). I also bulked up the Privacy/Security
>considerations descriptions since they are no longer mitigated.
>
>I'd like feedbac
This update removes the IANA registry (which is what I think I was supposed to
do based on the feedback to date). I also bulked up the Privacy/Security
considerations descriptions since they are no longer mitigated.
I'd like feedback on the best path forward. Essentially this draft replaces
t
11 matches
Mail list logo
