[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-dkim-delegate-01.txt

2014-06-20 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Playing around with ideas here. This one removes the l=0 signature stuff and instead makes DKIM-Delegate into a more self-contained thing, which I believe was suggested (or at least inspired) by Stephen's comments. There is still the potential for abuse during the ephemeral relationship period

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-dkim-delegate-01.txt

2014-06-20 Thread John Levine
Playing around with ideas here. This one removes the l=0 signature stuff and instead makes DKIM-Delegate into a more self-contained thing, which I believe was suggested (or at least inspired) by Stephen's comments. There is still the potential for abuse during the ephemeral relationship period

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-dkim-delegate-01.txt

2014-06-20 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:21 AM, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote: This looks an awful lot like my draft-levine-cdkim-00 and draft-levine-dkim-conditional-00 except that mine has more bits of DKIM in the cdkim signature so it can sign To and From to limit the range of spoofage. The

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kucherawy-dkim-delegate-01.txt

2014-06-20 Thread John R Levine
This looks an awful lot like my draft-levine-cdkim-00 and draft-levine-dkim-conditional-00 except that mine has more bits of DKIM in the cdkim signature so it can sign To and From to limit the range of spoofage. The difference is that this proposal doesn't change/extend/spin/fold/mutilate DKIM