TLDR summary: addressing "legitimate-but-unauthorizable" mail is my answer to Scott
Kitterman's question: "How do we define the scope of work for this list?".
Yup.
Yes, I get it, I guess in my own jaded way I don't think there is any
amount of money that Yahoo and AOL can spend that will fix
There's probably no point in coding a patch unless you feel the people
responsible for the codebase are likely to apply it. That's a lot of effort
down a rathole, especially since some number of the intended audience feel
that it's inappropriate to ask them to change anything in their software.
It
On May 29, 2014, at 3:05 AM, John R Levine wrote:
> Really, that makes no difference. I don't want Yahoo or anyone else to pay
> us to screw up our mail software to work around them -- I want them to spend
> their money to fix things so we don't have to.
Yes, I get it, I guess in my own jaded
Hello John, what you're missing -- and its easy to miss -- is that Yahoo
has an outstanding offer to help developers (this means $!) fix things.
Really, that makes no difference. I don't want Yahoo or anyone else to
pay us to screw up our mail software to work around them -- I want them to
sp
