Re: [dmarc-ietf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-02 Thread Seth Blank
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 3:21 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > That's my thought. I'll wait for the co-chairs before taking any actions > to > update the draft. > Scott, please prepare a new version of the I-D based upon your comments, but don't post it until IETF Last Call finishes and all other feed

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, April 1, 2020 9:04:57 PM EDT Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:06 AM Qin Wu via Datatracker > wrote: ... Since I'm the draft author, I'll weigh in: > Section 3.2 > > > OLD TEXT: > > " > > If the 'np' tag is absent, the policy specified by the "sp" tag (if the

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-01 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On the process questions raised: On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:06 AM Qin Wu via Datatracker wrote: > Minor issue: > This document provide two registries, one is update of DMARC Tag Registry > with > one new element, requested from IANA, the other is DMARC PSD registry > maintained by [psddmarc.org]

[dmarc-ietf] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

2020-04-01 Thread Qin Wu via Datatracker
Reviewer: Qin Wu Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that