Re: [dmarc-ietf] RFC 7489: Erratum 5371

2022-08-21 Thread John Levine
This one is also correct. It appears that Eliot Lear said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- >Dear Authors and DMARC group, > >In my continuing review of errata posted against RFC 7489, my view is >that the following erratum should be verified, and I intend to do so in >the next month

[dmarc-ietf] RFC 7489: Erratum 5371

2022-08-21 Thread Eliot Lear
Dear Authors and DMARC group, In my continuing review of errata posted against RFC 7489, my view is that the following erratum should be verified, and I intend to do so in the next month unless given good cause not to do so.  This is a clarification as to which gzip spec should be used.