[dmarc-ietf] Re: PSOs sending mail from their PSD

2024-05-13 Thread John Levine
It appears that Scott Kitterman said: > >>instead, it could say: >> >>Report generators MUST NOT consider ruf= tags in records having >>a "psd=y" tag, unless the domain is the RFC5322.From domain and/ >>or there are specific agreements between the interested parties. No. You can alwa

[dmarc-ietf] Re: PSOs sending mail from their PSD

2024-05-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On May 13, 2024 2:37:01 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >On Mon 13/May/2024 12:53:14 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >> >> On May 13, 2024 7:59:20 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> someone objected to PSDs being unable to receive failure reports even if >>> the PSD is the Fr

[dmarc-ietf] Re: PSOs sending mail from their PSD

2024-05-13 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On Mon 13/May/2024 12:53:14 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: On May 13, 2024 7:59:20 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: Hi, someone objected to PSDs being unable to receive failure reports even if the PSD is the From: domain. For example: _dmarc.psd.example IN TXT "p=none psd=y ruf=reports@psd.

[dmarc-ietf] Re: PSOs sending mail from their PSD

2024-05-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
On May 13, 2024 7:59:20 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >Hi, > >someone objected to PSDs being unable to receive failure reports even if the >PSD is the From: domain. For example: > >_dmarc.psd.example IN TXT "p=none psd=y ruf=reports@psd.example > >In case a mail having "From: user@psd.examp