On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 12:23 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is much to like about the new document. Thank you to the design
> team for your good work.
>
> For the NP policy, the MX/A/AAA test lacks the precise definition that I
> would expect to be requi
There is much to like about the new document. Thank you to the design
team for your good work.
For the NP policy, the MX/A/AAA test lacks the precise definition that I
would expect to be required for a standards-track document. Does another
document have language that we can use or reference?
