Brotman, Alex wrote on 2024-03-23 19:17:
Thanks for the feedback. I believe I've corrected all except
- 2.1: "(...) while there MUST be one spf sub-element". At least one according to the XML Schema
Definition (might be two, each with a different scope "helo" and "mfrom").
Can we talk about h
t how this looks in a sample report?
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: dmarc On Behalf Of Matthäus Wander
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 6:23 PM
> To: dmarc@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group L
Matthäus Wander wrote on 2024-03-21 23:23:
- 2.1: "In most cases, this will be a header_from element, which will
contain the 5322.From domain from the message." Add: "There may be an
envelope_from element, which contains the RFC5321.MailFrom domain."
This paragraph could use some more explanat
Barry Leiba wrote on 2024-02-29 16:03:
This document is also ready for our final look, so this message starts
a working group last call for the aggregate reporting document, with
the same timing as for the DMARC spec.
Please post to the DMARC mailing list by 31 March, giving your last
call comme
This document is also ready for our final look, so this message starts
a working group last call for the aggregate reporting document, with
the same timing as for the DMARC spec.
Please post to the DMARC mailing list by 31 March, giving your last
call comments (which should include “I read it and
