On Monday, December 6, 2021 1:59:19 PM EST Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 12/6/2021 10:48 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I understand you don't like what's there, but not how you think it should
> > be changed. The proposed revision addresses the concern I had raised.
> If a sentence or a paragraph is
On 12/6/2021 10:48 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I understand you don't like what's there, but not how you think it should be
changed. The proposed revision addresses the concern I had raised.
If a sentence or a paragraph is not providing necessary specification
and is not providing necessary
On December 6, 2021 6:39:17 PM UTC, Dave Crocker wrote:
>On 12/6/2021 10:06 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> OK. What's your recommendation then?
>
>Scott,
>
>I think my note contained a series of very basic recommendations. I'm
>not sure what else you are looking for.
What text (if any) would
On 12/6/2021 10:06 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
OK. What's your recommendation then?
Scott,
I think my note contained a series of very basic recommendations. I'm
not sure what else you are looking for.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
dcroc...@gmail.com
408.329.0791
Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
On Monday, December 6, 2021 1:01:51 PM EST Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 12/6/2021 9:38 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >> In the interests of future-proofing, should there ever be additional
> >> underlying authentication protocols, I propose this:
> >>
> >> Should any authentication failures for
On 12/6/2021 9:38 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
In the interests of future-proofing, should there ever be additional
underlying authentication protocols, I propose this:
Should any authentication failures for systems
under the Domain Owner's control be found in the reports, in cases
where the
On Monday, December 6, 2021 11:40:47 AM EST Todd Herr wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:08 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On December 6, 2021 1:35:10 PM UTC, Todd Herr >
> > 40valimail@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > >On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:45 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > >>
On Mon 06/Dec/2021 17:40:47 +0100 Todd Herr wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:08 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
On December 6, 2021 1:35:10 PM UTC, Todd Herr wrote:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:45 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
...
Should any overlooked systems be found in the
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 9:08 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On December 6, 2021 1:35:10 PM UTC, Todd Herr 40valimail@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:45 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> ...
> >>Should any overlooked systems be found in the
> >>
On December 6, 2021 1:35:10 PM UTC, Todd Herr
wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:45 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
...
>>Should any overlooked systems be found in the
>> reports, the Domain Owner can adjust the SPF record and/or configure
>> DKIM signing for
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 7:45 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a few nits about this section:
>
> This section describes Domain Owner actions to fully implement the
> DMARC mechanism.
>
> Actually, the section doesn't mention DMARC checking, adhering to policies
> found in
Hi,
I have a few nits about this section:
This section describes Domain Owner actions to fully implement the
DMARC mechanism.
Actually, the section doesn't mention DMARC checking, adhering to policies
found in DMARC records, and sending feedback reports. Hence I'd strike
"fully". It
12 matches
Mail list logo
