Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base revision submitted

2014-10-29 Thread Eliot Lear
Murray, You've clearly put a lot of work into updating this document, and there are a substantial number of changes. That means it deserves this group's serious attention. You've given me my homework assignment, I can say... Eliot On 10/29/14, 9:37 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Tue, Oct

Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base revision submitted

2014-10-29 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Since we're past the I-D deadline, the ISE or Pete will have to approve > its addition to the datatracker, so it will magically appear at some point > soon, and then move forward in the publication process. > It's now available in the

Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base revision submitted

2014-10-28 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Brett McDowell wrote: > Thanks Murray. That was a really important step. You continue to carry > the bulk of the email security standardization load on your shoulders, and > it is greatly appreciated! > Hi Brett, Thanks for your support. I was going to say "I

Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base revision submitted

2014-10-28 Thread Brett McDowell
Thanks Murray. That was a really important step. You continue to carry the bulk of the email security standardization load on your shoulders, and it is greatly appreciated! Cheers, -Brett On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Colleagues, > > With apologies once again

[dmarc-ietf] draft-kucherawy-dmarc-base revision submitted

2014-10-28 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
Colleagues, With apologies once again that it's taken so long, I have submitted the base draft again to the datatracker. It underwent what Eliot Lear calls a "haircut", which is to say I spent a good chunk of time rearranging the material, consolidating redundant sections, removing unnecessarily