Yes, will do.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Kurt Andersen wrote:
>
>>
>> Thank you for the suggestions. I'll work on incorporating them in the
>> next couple of days. If I have questions as I do that, I'll ping you
>> (Eliot) dire
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Kurt Andersen wrote:
>
> Thank you for the suggestions. I'll work on incorporating them in the next
> couple of days. If I have questions as I do that, I'll ping you (Eliot)
> directly.\\
>
Since this document is in WGLC, could we please do that on the list?
-MS
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> In doing a review of this current version, I note a small number of
> issues that can be resolved fairly quickly, I think.
>
Thank you for the suggestions. I'll work on incorporating them in the next
couple of days. If I have questions as I d
Hi everyone,
In doing a review of this current version, I note a small number of
issues that can be resolved fairly quickly, I think.
In Section 1:
>Email messages that do not conform to other email specifications but
>are considered legitimate by the intended recipients are not
>dis
