On 19/11/2020 21:33, Todd Herr wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:39 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On 18/11/2020 22:33, John R Levine wrote:
On 11/18/2020 12:44 PM, John Levine wrote:
so I encourage the group to limit the debate to the existing Org/PSL
kludge and a tree walk.
"and a tree walk"
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 7:39 AM Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On 18/11/2020 22:33, John R Levine wrote:
> >> On 11/18/2020 12:44 PM, John Levine wrote:
> >>> so I encourage the group to limit the debate to the existing Org/PSL
> >>> kludge and a tree walk.
> >>
> >> "and a tree walk" is not a minor
On 18/11/2020 22:33, John R Levine wrote:
On 11/18/2020 12:44 PM, John Levine wrote:
so I encourage the group to limit the debate to the existing Org/PSL
kludge and a tree walk.
"and a tree walk" is not a minor 'and'. neither conceptually nor
operationally. assurances to the contrary notwit
On 11/18/2020 12:44 PM, John Levine wrote:
so I encourage the group to limit the debate to the existing Org/PSL
kludge and a tree walk.
"and a tree walk" is not a minor 'and'. neither conceptually nor
operationally. assurances to the contrary notwithstanding.
I didn't say they were equival
On 11/18/2020 12:44 PM, John Levine wrote:
so I encourage the group to limit the debate to the existing Org/PSL
kludge and a tree walk.
"and a tree walk" is not a minor 'and'. neither conceptually nor
operationally. assurances to the contrary notwithstanding.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenbu
If we're going to refight the DBOUND battle, here's another entry,
which even has running code. I see no reason to think that we are any
more likely to endorse one of these now than we were a few years ago
so I encourage the group to limit the debate to the existing Org/PSL
kludge and a tree walk.
