Hi Behcet-san,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Behcet Sarikaya
wrote:
> Hi Satoru,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Let me continue the discussion with your text in Section 3.2 where you
> mention
> vEPC may utilizes Forwarding Policy Configuration Protocol (FPCP)
> that defines FPCP Agent functi
Ah OK. thanks.
Slightly off-topic, I think that there is still chance for tethering with
single /64 if it is allocated as a off-link prefix.
But yes, I agree with you.
cheers,
--satoru
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In additi
Hi Larry,
thanks for your feedback and valid doubts, as you pointed out an important
point to discuss.
First of all, the space for a certain field in the ID can be increased. We may
have a preceding
discussion about how the identifier format should look like; as proposed in
this version of
the
Le 29/05/2015 15:30, Satoru Matsushima a écrit :
Ah OK. thanks.
Slightly off-topic, I think that there is still chance for tethering
with single /64 if it is allocated as a off-link prefix.
Yes, there is still such a chance. But it can not tether more than one
single subnet. Connected vehicl
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 10:59 AM
> To: Satoru Matsushima
> Cc: dmm
> Subject: Re: [DMM] vepc draft Rev. 04 - /62s to UE, not /64s
>
> Le 29/05/2015 15:30, Satoru Matsushima a écrit
Hello Seil,
>
>>
>> #49: full on-demand mobility support
>>
>> The three proposed flags express a "type" of source IP address an
> application wants to get to the IP stack. Particularly, the sustained IP
> address is proposed to provide on-demand IP session continuity, which
> activates IP mobi
Hello Sergio,
On May 22, 2015, at 6:24 PM, FIGUEIREDO Sergio wrote:
> Hi Alper,
>
> As Seil wrote, the problem which this ticket intends to reflect is that of
> non-optimal routing as a result of not being able to request a non-anchored
> (or local) source IP address.
A non-anchored (local)
Hi Alper,
Thanks for the answer. Please check inline.
On 29-05-2015 22:44, Alper Yegin wrote:
Hello Sergio,
On May 22, 2015, at 6:24 PM, FIGUEIREDO Sergio wrote:
Hi Alper,
As Seil wrote, the problem which this ticket intends to reflect is that of
non-optimal routing as a result of not bein
I'm sorry but I had problems sending the previous message. Hope I succeed this
time, my response is inline.
De: dmm [dmm-boun...@ietf.org] em nome de FIGUEIREDO Sergio
[sergio.figueir...@altran.com]
Enviado: sexta-feira, 29 de maio de 2015 23:34
Para: Alper Yeg
