Yes, a 128bits ID or a set of 128bits IDs (at least a pair of IPv6 SA and DA)
looks sufficient.
5-tuple usually means transport layer IDs which beyond the IPv6 standard
headers but of course it could be a filter condition bound to what a 128bits ID
represents.
--satoru
> 2017/11/15
I support the adoption of this draft.
John
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:21 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of
draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as DMM WG document
Am I understanding that the hypothesis is that a 128 bit space (ID) is
sufficient to represent what is required in the packet to meet current and
planned mobility related use cases when coupled with the rest of the IPv6
standard header information (5-tuple)?
-Original Message-
From:
I support the adoption.
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:03 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of
draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as DMM WG document
Folks:
The following message
Hi all, I support the adoption of this draft.
Cheers!
--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
#email: jonghy...@gmail.com
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
> 2017. 11. 15. 09:02, Sri Gundavelli
