Re: [DMM] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Tom Herbert
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) < sgund...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > > I am working on a comparison between ILA and SRv6 for the mobile > user-plane. > > This is a good effort. I was wondering, about the key parameters that you > will use for this comparison betwee

Re: [DMM] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Typo's ... SID -> SIR From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sri Gundavelli mailto:sgund...@cisco.com>> Date: Friday, January 26, 2018 at 5:35 PM To: Tom Herbert mailto:t...@quantonium.net>>, "dmm@ietf.org" mailto:dmm@ietf.org>>, "i...@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Hi Tom, > I am working on a comparison between ILA and SRv6 for the mobile user-plane. This is a good effort. I was wondering, about the key parameters that you will use for this comparison between ILA/ILNP/LISP/HICN etc. For example, ILA router the entries at the ILA router ( ID - L OC - SIR

Re: [DMM] [Ila] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Tom Herbert
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Uma Chunduri wrote: > Comments are spot-on. > > > > Can somebody tell 8200 update would be a possibility in future (w.r.t 6man > consensus) i.e., EH insertion in the middle without re-encapsulating the > SRH again. > > I presume the technical aspect for the 8200

[DMM] Slight change in FPC draft terminology and related re-organization of some introductory concepts

2018-01-26 Thread Charlie Perkins
Hello folks, Looking at the FPC draft 10, it has the following organization in section 4: Version 10: 4    FPC Mobility Information Model 4.1    Model Notation and Conventions 4.2    Core Structure - Information Model Components 4.3    Topology 4.3.1    DPN 4.3.2    DPN-Type 4.3.3    DPN-Group

Re: [DMM] [Ila] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Uma Chunduri
Comments are spot-on. Can somebody tell 8200 update would be a possibility in future (w.r.t 6man consensus) i.e., EH insertion in the middle without re-encapsulating the SRH again. I presume the technical aspect for the 8200 mandate is the ability to fragment if needed at the insertion point. A

Re: [DMM] white paper for optimized mobile user plane solutions for 5G

2018-01-26 Thread Arashmid Akhavain
Hi Kalyani, I like your practical approach. In addition to the vendors though, I think It will help if we could get people from the service providers to present their point of view as well. It might take some time though before we get more clarifications from the vendors or carriers. In the mea

Re: [DMM] [Ila] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Hi Jeff, Out focus is on anchor management. W.r.t traffic steering, Satoru-san's work is the basis and we will leverage that. The below questions are specific to that work. We should discuss these points. Regards Sri From: Jeff Tantsura mailto:jefftant.i...@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, January 2

Re: [DMM] [Ila] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Hi Sri, My observations are very close to Tom’s. Is new draft going to address questions asked or there will be follow up? Thanks! Regards, Jeff > On Jan 26, 2018, at 09:19, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) > wrote: > > Hi Tom: > > Marco and myself are planning to publish another proposal on ancho

Re: [DMM] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Hi Tom: Marco and myself are planning to publish another proposal on anchor-less mobility (leveraging SRv6). That may be of interest to you from ILA point of view. We will post the draft in one or two weeks. Regards Sri From: dmm mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Tom Herbert ma

[DMM] Questions about SRv6 mobile user-plane

2018-01-26 Thread Tom Herbert
Hello, I am working on a comparison between ILA and SRv6 for the mobile user-plane. I have some questions/comments about SRv6 and particularly on the example use cases that were depicted in the slides that were presented in IETF100: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/slides-100-dm

Re: [DMM] white paper for optimized mobile user plane solutions for 5G

2018-01-26 Thread Bogineni, Kalyani
Arashmid: I was going to go through the process I followed to create the requirements in this white paper. Ideal would be if some of the vendors can invite their SA2/CT4 counterparts to give an overview of the architecture and of the interfaces/protocols in DMM WG. Then we can see if what we c

Re: [DMM] white paper for optimized mobile user plane solutions for 5G

2018-01-26 Thread Arashmid Akhavain
Hi Kalyani, Do you know if anyone from 3GPP will attend? Arashmid From: Bogineni, Kalyani [mailto:kalyani.bogin...@verizonwireless.com] Sent: 25 January 2018 12:04 To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) ; Arashmid Akhavain ; dmm@ietf.org Cc: AshwoodsmithPeter ; TongWen Subject: RE: [DMM] white paper fo