On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
wrote:
> FYI. This is the notes that Carlos captured. Thank you Carlos!!
>
> We are also waiting for Lyle to share his notes. Please review and
> comment, if you see any mistakes.
>
With regards to SR encapsulation: "this is using IP-in-I
Thank you Tom for your suggestion.
Do you think that GUE has some advantages against GTP-U?
When it comes to foo over UDP capsulation, does GUE benefit user plane beyond
GTP-U?
Best regards,
--satoru
> 2018/03/27 9:16、Tom Herbert のメール:
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgu
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Satoru Matsushima
wrote:
> Thank you Tom for your suggestion.
>
> Do you think that GUE has some advantages against GTP-U?
I believe so. GUE is designed to be a general purposed multi use case
encapsulation. The defined GUE extensions deal with problems and
provid
Thank you Tom,
Unfortunately I couldn’t find clear advantage of GUE against GTP-U. (No
offensive, please don’t get me wrong.)
I couldn’t see GUE in NVO WG doc list. But I can see much more foo-over-UDP
type encapsulation in IETF.
IMO Unified concept in that encapsulation doesn’t seem to work in
