Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

I think the document is ready for further progress. +1 for adoption as WG document. Regards, -Xinpeng From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rahman, Akbar Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 4:44 AM To: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) ; Hugo, Dirk

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

I agree with Sri. I also gave the authors some comments on this -01 revision but am fine if it gets addressed after it becomes a WG draft. +1 for adopting as WG document. Best Regards, Akbar From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [DMM] IETF101 DMM WG Meeting Notes #1

I agree on your comment about more use cases. We should consider all those scenarios and see what fits the bill. Arashmid -Original Message- From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@quantonium.net] Sent: 27 March 2018 15:59 To: Arashmid Akhavain Cc: Satoru

Re: [DMM] IETF101 DMM WG Meeting Notes #1

Hi Tom, I totally understand your point. But RFC8200 doesn't single out the source as the only node that can do this type of manipulation. "Any node along a packet's delivery path" is rather open to interpretation. Arashmid -Original Message- From: Tom Herbert

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Hi Sri, Danny Thanks - you are right and I agree - also with what Danny said and I am in favor of adoption as WG draft! Best Regards Dirk From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) [mailto:sgund...@cisco.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 28. März 2018 16:39 To: von Hugo, Dirk ; dmm@ietf.org

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

HI Dirk, Thanks for your feedback. I understand there have been some reviews and authors have not yet had a chance to update the I-D, but that should be OK. We are taking up this draft as a starting point and the draft will evolve based on the WG feedback. So, that should not be an issue.

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Hi, Adopting a draft as a WG draft does not mean that we accept it as is and plan not to improve it. It means that the WG agrees that it is something that we want to work on and that it aligns with the WG charter. So the fact that there are some fixes in the pipeline is irrelevant, in my

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Dear all, I support this draft. Best regards, Daniel Corujo Instituto de Telecomunicações - Pólo de Aveiro http://www.it.pt Watch our VIDEO: https://youtu.be/lI8DnmBnEtU Internet Technology Letters Journal is accepting publications:

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Hi Sri, recalling that there have been some reviews on this version -01 and the authors already replied and promised consideration in next version -02 before London I would recommend to have this call on the new -02 version. Would this be possible to provide soon? Other opinions? Thanks! Best

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document

Hi, I support making this draft a WG draft. BR, Danny From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 07:26 To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-bernardos-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-01 as DMM WG document Folks: During