Dear All, For the Dino's question -
> Do you think carriers will build an IPv6-only NGC at this point in time? I don't think so (from the existing deployments perspective, including early 5G transitions). So, IMO - any mobility solution ought to be underlay independent - to allow flexibility for the operators. I see this discussion is independent of address space exhaustion or IPv6 address to UE.. -- Uma C. -----Original Message----- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dino Farinacci Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 5:02 PM To: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [DMM] User Plane Protocol Study in 3GPP That sounds like you want to do IPv4 over IPv6. Do you think carriers will build an IPv6-only NGC at this point in time? Dino > On Mar 20, 2018, at 6:33 PM, Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Next header type maybe? > Interestingly GTP-U doesn’t have it. > > Sent from my iPhone > > 2018/03/20 18:17、Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com>のメール: > >> How? Please summarize in one sentence and don’t me to a draft. >> >> Dino >> >>> On Mar 20, 2018, at 10:24 AM, Satoru Matsushima >>> <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yes , supports IPv4 PDU with minimum effort. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> 2018/03/20 16:47、Lyle Bertz <lyleb551...@gmail.com>のメール: >>> >>>> I did not get to ask but I know your presentation talks about IPv6 but is >>>> there a requirement to support IPv4 mobile or dual stack? >>>> >>>> Lyle >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> dmm@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
