Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

2018-12-17 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Hi Satoru-San, Thank you for your comments. All the LS statements received from 3GPP with regards to the work item on, User Plane Optimization study, will be taken into consideration in this decision process. Sri On 12/17/18, 1:19 AM, "Satoru Matsushima" wrote: >Thank you Sri, and all, > >D

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

2018-12-17 Thread Satoru Matsushima
More precisely on the latter point, > >> Particularly the discussion around slicing is very speculative. And >> conclusion thereof that “The expected evaluation points from this aspect >> should be whether the candidate protocols can support to indicate a network >> slice in the UP packets.” F

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-hmm-dmm-5g-uplane-analysis-02 as DMM WG document

2018-12-17 Thread Satoru Matsushima
Thank you Sri, and all, During that, let me make clear some questions and comments. First one: > So the purpose of this draft seems to explicitly be to do work for 3GPP that > they have explicitly said they DO NOT WANT. It’s wrong. In the LS of CP-173160 requested any information regarding user