> > Hi Sridhar, > > > Thanks for your review. > > My response in-line [Uma]: > > -- > Uma C. > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:49 PM Sridhar Bhaskaran < > sridhar.bhaska...@huawei.com> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I reviewed draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-02 and I have the following >> comments based on 3GPP architectural definitions in TS 23.501 / 23.502 >> >> 1. Section 2.1 - RQI is just a flag to tell the UE that it has to reflect >> back the same QFI in the uplink packet. RQI on its own is not a QoS >> indicator. Hence the use of RQI in the following sentence is not correct >> >> Mapping of the PDU sessions to TE >> paths can be done based on the source UDP port ranges (if these are >> assigned based on the PDU session QCIs, as done in some deployments >> with 4G/LT) of the GTP-U encapsulated packet or based on the 5QI or >> RQI values in the GTP-U header. >> > > [Uma]: Agree. References to RQI for down link and 5QI for uplink too > would be corrected to QFI in the header. > > >> >> 2. Section 2.1, 2.2 - and almost everywhere - Restricting to description >> of gNB as the radio side is not correct. 5G architecture allows the radio >> or access node to be any of the following: >> a) gNB (which means radio is NR) >> b) Ng-eNB (which means radio is EUTRA) >> c) Untrusted WLAN >> d) From R16 onwards wireline and Trusted wireless LAN access >> >> So the draft should generally mention as 5G-AN and not as gNB. >> > [Uma]: Shall fix this. Does Standalone or non-standalone mode of NR make > any difference w.r.t what's been laid out? > >> >> 3. The draft mixes SSC modes with slicing concept. SSC modes and slicing >> are two independent concepts. UL/CL and BP UPF are applicable to all SSC >> modes. SSC modes do not have any relevance when selecting a transport path. >> The description of SSC modes need to be corrected to rather reflect how / >> where the PPR-ID is applied for different SSC modes. >> > > [Uma]: Shall remove UL/CL discussion specific to SSC mode 3 (as this is > applicable to any mode). But shall keep the SSC mode 3 for BP UPF case to > describe the E2E path with PPR-ID. > >> >> Regards >> Sridhar Bhaskaran >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> dmm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
