Can you please provide a calling sequence of your proposal?
Thanks,
Danny
-Original Message-
From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@quantonium.net]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 17:17
To: Moses, Danny
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-17.txt
On Mon, Mar 4,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:29 AM Moses, Danny wrote:
>
> Can you please provide a calling sequence of your proposal?
>
Something like:
s = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0) ;
setsockopt(s, IPPROTO_IP, PREFERRED_ADDRESS_TYPE,
IPV6_REQUIRE_SESSION_LASTING_IP)
if (connect(s, &serverInfo, sizeof(server
Dear all,
searching for update on this (meanwhile expired) draft I only found the 103
minutes quoting Charlie with " We should get a solid architectural and
informational yang that should be applicable."
I also read Carlos' comment on more general applicability and wonder whether
the topic of C
Dirk,
It is not difficult to extend FPC for BNG as most of the rules are similar in
structure. My team built an FPC agent and we are now building Sx (3GPP CUPS
PFCP) but it is at best a subset of FPC and has some holes. I am unsure I
would materially update FPC based on what I have learned
