Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

2021-07-23 Thread Uma Chunduri
Dear Dave, I got what you are saying. >The sorts of features we are seeing in the larger 3GPP picture AFAIK are more recent additions for URLLC, CIoT etc. >So picking and choosing based on convenience is not an option; the problem space is not a matter of choosing what to support, >but in replica

Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

2021-07-23 Thread David Allan I
Hi Uma Thanks for this, in line below. From: Uma Chunduri Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 12:04 PM To: David Allan I Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13 Hi Dave, Very good list and I am sure there could be a bit more functiona

Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

2021-07-23 Thread Uma Chunduri
Hi Dave, Very good list and I am sure there could be a bit more functionalities GTP overlay has been supporting over a period of time *and* still currently being used in various parts of the cellular networks. Replacing overlays may be a good goal if we can bring the same technical benefits diff

Re: [DMM] Additional questions/comments on draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-13

2021-07-23 Thread David Allan I
Hi: Looking over this draft it strikes me that IF you are discussing a GTP replacement, there are a few unaddressed gaps...or at least I see no mention of them. - adding X2 to the list of interfaces to be supported - support for end-marker for handoff stream synchronization (probably could f