Re: [DMM] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja/Alexey/Ben, Please let me know if there are further comments on the rework (changed draft re-attached to this email). -- Regards, Dhananjay -Original Message- From: "Dhananjay Patki (dhpatki)" Date: Tuesday, 9 May 2017 at 9:44 PM To: Mirja Kühlewind , Alexey Melni

Re: [DMM] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: (with COMMENT)

[Resending with some formatting changes] Hi Mirja/Alexey/Ben, Thanks for your respective reviews. Please find below responses to your comments. The comments are addressed in the new version 05 that is attached to this email (not uploaded yet). Please review the rework and let me know if you h

Re: [DMM] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-04: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja/Alexey/Ben, Thanks for your respective reviews. Please find below responses to your comments. The comments are addressed in the new version 05 that is attached to this email (not uploaded yet). Please review the rework and let me know if you have any further comments. ---

Re: [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-02

Hello, Thanks for the review. We will address the comments and get back with a new version of the draft. -- Regards, Dhananjay -Original Message- From: Ralph Droms Date: Wednesday, 21 December 2016 at 11:51 PM To: "int-...@ietf.org" Cc: "dmm@ietf.org" , "i...@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-

Re: [DMM] IPR call for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-02

I am not aware of any related IPR either. Regards, Dhananjay Sent from Samsung Mobile Original message From: "Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]" Date:03/09/2016 01:29 (GMT+05:30) To: Dapeng Liu , draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-par...@ietf.org Cc: dmm Subject: Re: [DMM] IPR call for dra

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01

Hi Perrick, Default values of other configuration variables are now defined in revision 02. -- Thanks, Dhananjay -Original Message- From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" Date: Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 7:41 PM To: "pierrick.se...@orange.com" , "jouni.nos...@gmail.com"

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01

Hi Seil, Revision 02 of this draft has been uploaded. The typos that you pointed out are addressed. -- Thanks, Dhananjay -Original Message- From: dmm on behalf of "Dhananjay S. Patki" Date: Friday, 1 July 2016 at 9:33 AM To: Seil Jeon , "dmm@ietf.org" Cc: '成 鹏' Subject: Re: [DM

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01

Hi Siel, Please see inline. -- Regards, Dhananjay -Original Message- From: dmm on behalf of Seil Jeon Date: Tuesday, 21 June 2016 at 2:38 PM To: "dmm@ietf.org" Cc: '成 鹏' , "dmm@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 >Hi, > >I have read

Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01

Hi Yan, 1) in the Introduction Section, "have tens of thousands of MAGs" is too specific here to describe the scenario. [Dhananjay] This extension becomes necessary when there is a large scale of MAGs and the above wording is only to realize that. But of course, it can be used even at smaller s

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params

Hi Alex, The PBAs are only in response to the PBUs. If the parameters need to be sent from the LMA to the MAG in an unsolicited manner to override previously assigned values, then they could be included in Update Notification message per RFC 7077. Is that what you intended to ask? -- Regards, Dhan