This draft is about hICN and discusses various deployment options with
associated pros and cons, without supporting one specifically. Clearly,
depending on application requirements, on network constraints, on phase of
deployment/transition etc. one option may be preferrable over another one (a
More on the mobility use case which also makes deployment options easier to
digest
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-auge-dmm-hicn-mobility/
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 4:33 PM Giovanna Carofiglio (gcarofig) <
gcaro...@cisco.com> wrote:
> This draft is about hICN and discusses various deployme
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:33 AM, Giovanna Carofiglio (gcarofig) <
gcaro...@cisco.com> wrote:
> This draft is about hICN and discusses various deployment options with
> associated pros and cons, without supporting one specifically. Clearly,
> depending on application requirements, on network const
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Luca Muscariello
wrote:
> More on the mobility use case which also makes deployment options easier to
> digest
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-auge-dmm-hicn-mobility/
>
>From the draft:
"The goal of hICN is to ease ICN insertion in existing IP infrastr
The adjective minor is used in a comparative way. At least I intended that
way.
hICN allows to implement ICN features with less changes than using ICN as
an overlay.
On an absolute scale, I don't think that hICN requires negligible changes.
So I haven't used the adjective minor as a synonym of negl
I am sorry but I'm not sure I get your question right.
I am not sure SRv6 is just a tunnelling technique but I am not right person
to talk about that.
We do mention SRv6 in the draft to show how hICN can use it to steer the
next-hop path for the request
carrying the ID in the DST addr field and f
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Luca Muscariello
wrote:
> The adjective minor is used in a comparative way. At least I intended that
> way.
> hICN allows to implement ICN features with less changes than using ICN as an
> overlay.
> On an absolute scale, I don't think that hICN requires negligible
There are several points raised here:
1) Alleged protocol layering violations and the e2e principle.
2) Relationship between the OS and transport services.
1) Many see the e2e principle as another instance of Occam's razor applied
to communication
protocols function placement, I think it is even
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Luca Muscariello
wrote:
> There are several points raised here:
> 1) Alleged protocol layering violations and the e2e principle.
> 2) Relationship between the OS and transport services.
>
>
> 1) Many see the e2e principle as another instance of Occam's razor applie
These solutions are not all isomorphic and comparison requires some careful
taxonomy first.
The -01 version of the draft Kalyani is taking care of will include that
and will definitely help to
compare things.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane
Let's wai
10 matches
Mail list logo
