Le 24/04/2015 21:22, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
I am still not convinced.
At home I have LTE.
LTE can be 3G if it is somewhat degraded and 3G is also available, so
no reason for inter technology handoff.
YEs there is reason.
At home one may prefer the cheap 802.11ac instead of 3G. The bandwith
Le 24/04/2015 21:30, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
[...]
When the car arrives home it connects to the WiFi available in
home, thus handing over from LTE. This is a sold use-case at e.g.
Tesla. The WiFi hotspot can be the one deployed in-house,
in-garage, or the WiFi offered by the electrical rechar
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
wrote:
> Le 23/04/2015 19:11, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 22/04/2015 18:06, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:55
I am still not convinced.
At home I have LTE.
LTE can be 3G if it is somewhat degraded and 3G is also available, so
no reason for inter technology handoff.
I am also concerned on some other MN ids proposed like RFid, what is
the assumption there? Is it that the sensor node will have Mobile IP
clie
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:27 AM
> To: sarik...@ieee.org
> Cc: sofiane.imad...@gmail.com; Basavaraj Patil; dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption:
Le 23/04/2015 19:11, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
wrote:
Le 22/04/2015 18:06, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
wrote:
Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
Folks,
The ado
Hello Behcet,
On 4/23/2015 10:11 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
The model of Internet access to the cars for cars currently on market in
Europe is the same - the LTE technology is used, using the IMSI as an
identifier. However, that does not use MN-ID, is only IPv4, is not WiFi and
does not resist
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
wrote:
> Le 22/04/2015 18:06, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
Folks,
The adoption call
Le 22/04/2015 18:06, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
wrote:
Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
Folks,
The adoption call for this I-D has ended. There is a clear concensus to
adopt the I-D as a working group item.
I suppo
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
wrote:
> Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> The adoption call for this I-D has ended. There is a clear concensus to
>> adopt the I-D as a working group item.
>
>
> I support its adoption.
>
> We have been
Hello folks,
The ...-00 document draft-dmm-4283mnids-00.txt has been submitted.
I'll make a new draft with VIN as a type of MNID as soon as Alex's
questions have
proposed answers.
Regards,
Charlie P.
On 4/21/2015 12:55 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écr
Le 16/04/2015 06:58, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
Folks,
The adoption call for this I-D has ended. There is a clear concensus to
adopt the I-D as a working group item.
I support its adoption.
We have been working with an identifier specific to automobiles to use
to realize access control. Ident
Folks,
The adoption call for this I-D has ended. There is a clear concensus to
adopt the I-D as a working group item.
- Jouni & Dapeng
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoptio
@tools.ietf.org
>Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption: draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
>
>Folks,
>
>This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
> draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
>to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th EOB
>PST.
>
>Express y
I support the adoption of this draft.
--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
#email: jonghy...@gmail.com
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
> On Apr 4, 2015, at 5:38 AM, pierrick.se...@orange.com wrote:
>
I support adoption of this I-D
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
> Folks,
>
> This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
>draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
> to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
> EOB PST.
>
> Express your support or opposition t
[as an individual contributor]
I support the adoption of this document.
- Jouni
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document;
I only have an editorial comment - Section 2 makes reference to an EPC
and a few other acronyms. Expanding a few of these out may help some
readers.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This emails starts a
I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document;
There was good amount of discussion on supporting RFID related
identifiers. We need to make sure all of those comments will be addressed
in the subsequent revisions.
Sri
On 4/1/15, 8:02 AM, "Jouni Korhonen" wrote:
>Folks,
>
>This email
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
Express your support or opposition to the mailing list. During the
IETF92 meeting we got 7 voices for the adoption so at least
20 matches
Mail list logo