Re: [DMM] SRv6 for 5G Mobile [was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt]

2018-03-09 Thread Arashmid Akhavain
Great work Satoru-san, The paper certainly strengthens the case for the user of SRV6 in the back-haul. Arashmid -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima Sent: 07 March 2018 18:34 To: dmm Subject: [DMM] SRv6 for 5G Mobile [was Re: I-D

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for 5G Mobile [was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt]

2018-03-08 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Thanks for sharing this paper; makes the case for your SRv6 work in DMM. Great work!!! Sri On 3/7/18, 3:34 PM, "dmm on behalf of Satoru Matsushima" wrote: >FYI. A blog entry posted to APNIC: > >"Reducing the complexity of 5G networks using Segment Routing IPv6" >https://blog.apnic.net/2018/0

[DMM] SRv6 for 5G Mobile [was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-01.txt]

2018-03-07 Thread Satoru Matsushima
FYI. A blog entry posted to APNIC: "Reducing the complexity of 5G networks using Segment Routing IPv6" https://blog.apnic.net/2018/03/07/reducing-complexity-5g-networks-using-segment-routing-ipv6/ Please take a look. Cheers, --satoru > 2018/03/06 9:34、Satoru Matsushima のメール: > > Dear folks, >