Thanks Jude.
The Slackware package is delayed, but only due to the lack of a Slackware style
script. I might try to ask one of the Slackware team for assistance when I
resume work. However, the package is fairly much completed in terms of
installation points and directory setup.
Sent from my W
I agree T. J.
The problem is too much "thinking" about problems, rather than offering a clear
solution other than scrapping the fore and replacing it entirely seems to be
the source of the problem.
One argument I stand by adamantly is that while sysvinit was imperfect in
design, it left room t
I am reposting this with apologies to all concerned. Outlook mangled the
message text. The top few paragraphs were not my own. They belong to James
P.
>Unfortunately this seems to be a growing trend following the Microsoft
playbook of acquisition, suppressi
Unfortunately this seems to be a growing trend following the Microsoft playbook
of acquisition, suppression, and extinction on various Linux communities and
mailing lists I've been privy to as of recent.
Fewer and fewer distributions have avoided systemd but discussion into
alternatives i
Hey everyone,
I have the latest news for vdev:
* vdev now creates symlinks for:
-- /dev/v4l/by-path
-- /dev/disk/by-partuuid
-- /dev/disk/by-partlabel
Thank you Scooby for helping me confirm this!
* vdev now sets the proper ownership and permissions for:
-- /dev/mISDNtimer
-- /dev/mwave
-- /dev
Unfortunately this seems to be a growing trend following the Microsoft playbook
of acquisition, suppression, and extinction on various Linux communities and
mailing lists I've been privy to as of recent.
Fewer and fewer distributions have avoided systemd but discussion into
alternatives is grow
> -Original Message-
> From: Dng [mailto:dng-boun...@lists.dyne.org] On Behalf Of Daniel
> Reurich
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 3:58 PM
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: [Dng] Devuan - Fork or Derivative (or perhaps both)
>
> Hi
>
> I wonder if Devuan should rebrand its relationship t
> -Original Message-
> From: Dng [mailto:dng-boun...@lists.dyne.org] On Behalf Of David Hare
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 8:12 PM
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: Re: [Dng] A novice attempt to speed up Devuan development
>
> While we're waiting for vdev (that does look like the way t
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> basically ignore this mail, it has no relevant content. Actually when you see
> it, it's moot ;-)
well it contains some truth, indeed the postfix queue needed some
attention, no mails were lost, the last 3 days of traffic was just
delivered. thanks
On 13/05/15 03:12, David Hare wrote:
While we're waiting for vdev (that does look like the way to go) I
revisited eudev, which I never managed to get working in a usable way.
Did much better this time after some not too major hacking of the
source posted on devuan git, mostly "rules" and "pa
On Wed, 2015-05-13 at 00:24 -0400, JeremyBekka C wrote:
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 11:03:22 +0200
> From: Svante Signell
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: [Dng] Valentine alpha: Was: Re: Financial report, 1st
> trimester 2015
> Message-ID: <1430730202.4404.91.ca...@gmail.
It's sad there is so much hostility to people who struggle to keep init freedom
available, I am very thankful to the devs of devuan !
On May 11, 2015 5:00:02 AM PDT, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote:
>Send Dng mailing list submissions to
> dng@lists.dyne.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe
Hello,
We released a (beta) security tool to give non-windows operating systems a
base level of security based on government guideline and industry best
practices.
https://github.com/CSD-Public/stonix
The documentation is a bit sketchy, but feel free to check it out.
Let me know if I can answer
Hey there, every-Devuan:
Is this list just being unusually quiet, or is my email broken? Or is
dng broken?
Anyway, I have set up a repo to which I am frequently pushing new
packages from git.devuan.org not yet served from packages.devuan.org.
(And some new gnome packages as I strip and bu
With respect, Edward, I can't imagine why you are taking the "long way
around" in regards to systemd XFCE 4.12 can be compiled without systemd to
my knowledge. That would eliminate any concerns.
T.J.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:17:08PM -0700, James Powell wrote:
> Unfortunately the moderators at LinuxQuestions have closed off discussing the
> Devuan stance topic that had been open and participate in over the repeated
> squabbling, though honestly, very little was done other than the people who
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:17:08PM -0700, James Powell wrote:
> Unfortunately the moderators at LinuxQuestions have closed off discussing the
> Devuan stance topic that had been open and participate in over the repeated
> squabbling, though honestly, very little was done other than the people who
>This is the exact situation in which I'm glad for containers and VMs.
>Use all the systemd you want, but keep it in a Biosafety level 4
>containment facility.
I'd use a VM. I suspect a container or chroot would not be sufficient. =)
All jokes aside, this would be why I am watching the systembs
I've read the mentioned thread, although not completely yet, and I
appreciated Jude's and nextime's interventions. Guys, you met TobiSGD,
who should be a LQ moderator but is also an active systemd advocate,
according to what I've seen in the past (and more than ever on that very
thread). Unfort
basically ignore this mail, it has no relevant content. Actually when you see
it, it's moot ;-)
/j
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Hi
I wonder if Devuan should rebrand it's relationship to Debian as a
Derivative rather then a Fork. It may help to smooth things over a bit.
This may also be a good marketing approach as well as reduce the
hostility when we send bugreports and patches to debian.
Regards,
Daniel.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:17:08PM -0700, James Powell wrote:
> Unfortunately the moderators at LinuxQuestions have closed off discussing the
> Devuan stance topic that had been open and participate in over the repeated
> squabbling, though honestly, very little was done other than the people who
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Jack L. Frost wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:03:02PM -0400, Jude Nelson wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I have the latest news for vdev:
>
> Hi. I dunno if it's very relevant to this particular mailing list, but
> still.
> I've packaged vdev and all its depe
# Devuan News Issue XXIV
__Volume 02, Week 19, Devuan Week 24__
Released Tuesday, 12015/05/12 [HE](why-he)
https://git.devuan.org/devuan-editors/devuan-news/wikis/past-issues/volume-02/issue-024
## Editorial
You may have noticed that some time has elapsed since the last issue was
published. We
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 08:03:02PM -0400, Jude Nelson wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I have the latest news for vdev:
Hi. I dunno if it's very relevant to this particular mailing list, but still.
I've packaged vdev and all its dependencies for Arch:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vdev-git
https:
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:17:08PM -0700, James Powell wrote:
> Unfortunately the moderators at LinuxQuestions have closed off discussing the
> Devuan stance topic that had been open and participate in over the repeated
> squabbling, though honestly, very little was done other than the people who
While we're waiting for vdev (that does look like the way to go) I
revisited eudev, which I never managed to get working in a usable way.
Did much better this time after some not too major hacking of the source
posted on devuan git, mostly "rules" and "patches". I now got it working
seemingly
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 11:03:22 +0200
From: Svante Signell
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: [Dng] Valentine alpha: Was: Re: Financial report, 1st
trimester 2015
Message-ID: <1430730202.4404.91.ca...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
On Sun, 2015-05-
--
Franco (nextime) Lanza
Lonate Pozzolo (VA) - Italy
SIP://c...@casa.nexlab.it
web: http://www.nexlab.net
NO TCPA: http://www.no1984.org
you can download my public key at:
http://danex.nexlab.it/nextime.asc || Key Servers
Key ID = D6132D50
Key fingerprint = 66ED 5211 9D59 DA53 1DF7 4189 DFED
29 matches
Mail list logo
