On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 18:05:47 -0500
Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * On 2015 29 Aug 16:14 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > Yeah, that isn't a problem, and shouldn't be a problem.
> > Interestingly, in my LUG, the most pro-systemd guys are the
> > mega-metal admins administering hundreds of boxes with hundr
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:20:41 +0200
Laurent Bercot wrote:
> On 29/08/2015 23:11, Steve Litt wrote:
> > in my LUG, the most pro-systemd guys are the mega-metal admins
> > administering hundreds of boxes with hundreds of Docker containers.
> > These guys are telling me systemd is necessary to effici
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 16:47:18 +0100
Dave Turner wrote:
> I always thought su was the wrong way to go about things.
> Give me sudo every time.
How much stuff do you want to put in sudoers? You really want to do
what Ubuntu does?
> (there are assorted long discussions about su vs sudo out there on
On 30/08/2015 04:29, Isaac Dunham wrote:
Correction for this:
Alpine Linux is OpenRC based.
Ah, sorry, I mixed them: it's Void Linux that's runit-based.
--
Laurent
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailm
Edward Bartolo writes:
> OK, poWaitOnExit added and zombies creation has been reduced. However,
> I am still getting these:
>
> 3584 ?00:00:00 kworker/u8:0
> 3586 ?00:00:00 kworker/1:3
> 3588 ?00:00:01 netman
> 3623 ?00:00:00 ifdown
> 3644 ?00:00:00 kwo
On 08/30/2015 07:40 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
OK, poWaitOnExit added and zombies creation has been reduced. However,
I am still getting these:
3584 ?00:00:00 kworker/u8:0
3586 ?00:00:00 kworker/1:3
3588 ?00:00:01 netman
3623 ?00:00:00 ifdown
3644 ?
Laurent Bercot writes:
> On 29/08/2015 14:43, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> 'su' is not a concept, it's a program.
>
> Okay, let's clarify.
> A program is the implementation of an idea. The idea is often
> unwritten or unspoken, or forgotten, and people will only refer
> to the implementation; but
Steve Litt writes:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:20:41 +0200
> Laurent Bercot wrote:
>
>> On 29/08/2015 23:11, Steve Litt wrote:
>> > in my LUG, the most pro-systemd guys are the mega-metal admins
>> > administering hundreds of boxes with hundreds of Docker containers.
>> > These guys are telling me
* On 2015 30 Aug 02:27 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> You know why, Nate. You were on Debian-User in the bad old days. Back
> in the day, how many times did I get called a conspiracy theorist for
> answering that question.
>
> Three words:
>
> 1. Follow
> 2. the
> 3. money.
Sigh, yes, I know. I'm s
Merge accepted.
Kind regards,
Edward.
On 30/08/2015, tilt! wrote:
>
>
> On 08/30/2015 07:40 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>> OK, poWaitOnExit added and zombies creation has been reduced. However,
>> I am still getting these:
>>
>> 3584 ?00:00:00 kworker/u8:0
>> 3586 ?00:00:00 kwork
I explicitly avoided to use WaitOnExit() to avoid having to use
multi-threading which I wanted to avoid. I will try to create a
descendant of TThread to use it to Connect and Disconnect but I need
to be cautious to avoid complicating the code.
On 30/08/2015, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Merge accepted
I don't understand su, and don't want to read his manpage, let's reinvent
it poorly:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/1022
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Edward Bartolo writes:
> I explicitly avoided to use WaitOnExit() to avoid having to use
> multi-threading which I wanted to avoid. I will try to create a
> descendant of TThread to use it to Connect and Disconnect but I need
> to be cautious to avoid complicating the code.
All you need to do is
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 13:39:28 +0100
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Steve Litt writes:
>
> > On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 02:20:41 +0200
> > Laurent Bercot wrote:
> >
> >> On 29/08/2015 23:11, Steve Litt wrote:
> >> > in my LUG, the most pro-systemd guys are the mega-metal admins
> >> > administering hundreds
On 30/08/2015 20:54, Steve Litt wrote:
http://www.ibuildthecloud.com/blog/2014/12/03/is-docker-fundamentally-flawed
Very nice!
Note that the article is about the containers' *host*.
When people talk about "making systemd work with containers",
they're usually meaning running systemd *in* the
It seems to me that with so much in common GNU/Linux or UNIX use that
was so deeply flawed, he/Redhat would have been further ahead to just
fork off and create Poettericks or or Poetterdows.
I guess the problem with heading in that direction would have be the
lack of recognition, his project/o
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:20:15 -0400
Clarke Sideroad wrote:
> It seems to me that with so much in common GNU/Linux or UNIX use that
> was so deeply flawed, he/Redhat would have been further ahead to just
> fork off and create Poettericks or or Poetterdows.
No, because in a head to head showdown
On 2015-08-31 05:34, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:20:15 -0400
Clarke Sideroad wrote:
It seems to me that with so much in common GNU/Linux or UNIX use that
was so deeply flawed, he/Redhat would have been further ahead to just
fork off and create Poettericks or or Poetterdows.
No,
And all along I thought a "dock" had to do with a place to put program
icons on a desktop and that "docker" was a tool to handle it. I've
ignored everything about virtual machines except for Virtual Box and
QEMU.
Evidently, I now have to know that a "container" is a virtual machine.
Or is it? Se
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 09:11:01PM -0500, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> And all along I thought a "dock" had to do with a place to put program
> icons on a desktop and that "docker" was a tool to handle it. I've
> ignored everything about virtual machines except for Virtual Box and
> QEMU.
>
> Evidently
WaitOnExit causes the main thread to wait until the backend finishes.
This means it will hang the main thread making the GUI irritatingly
unresponsive. Thus, the only way out is to use multi-threading.
Regarding zombies, these were automatically adopted by the frontend as
terminating the latter al
> WaitOnExit causes the main thread to wait until the backend finishes.
> This means it will hang the main thread making the GUI irritatingly
> unresponsive. Thus, the only way out is to use multi-threading.
Multithreading is almost always a bad idea, fortunately there
are other options:
Have you
Le 30/08/2015 17:08, Emiliano Marini a écrit :
I don't understand su, and don't want to read his manpage, let's
reinvent it poorly
I use su everyday.
If you don't like it, don't use it.
If you are afraid of using it by mistyping, alias it.
Could we put an end to this thread?
23 matches
Mail list logo
