Hi all,
I uploaded short video of netman-gtk3.
gnuinos.org/netman-gtk3/netman.mpg
The project isn't finished. Shortly i will push the code to gitlab.
Cheers,
Aitor.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mai
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 02:30:15PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> Thanks for the links. Actually I think I derived my PS1 settings
> from an example found in some default .bashrc. I found the colors by
> try and fail, or maybe I looked at what ncurses was producing. Of
> course you don't want t
On Sun, 1/24/16, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] Ad filtering and blocking
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Sunday, January 24, 2016, 5:34 PM
On Sun, 1/24/16, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] Ad filtering and blocking
To: dng@lists.d
On Sun, 1/24/16, da...@olansa.co.uk wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] Ad filtering and blocking
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Sunday, January 24, 2016, 1:18 PM
> Thanks for your reply. I am noticing that since some time ago websites
> are starting to 'brainwash' users to use cookies. This is often do
Apollia writes:
[...]
> Emacs recently reawakened my curiosity about Lisp, which was originally
> piqued years ago by Paul Graham's articles on Lisp:
>
> http://www.paulgraham.com/lisp.html
>
> I never got far with Lisp all those years ago. But, recently, I found
> working with Emacs Lisp a lot
You can remove some cookie notices with prebake:
http://prebake.eu/
If you look in the ublock dashboard it's under the regional section of third
party filters
On Sunday, January 24, 2016 5:56 PM, Stephanie Daugherty
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I am noticing that since some time ago websites
> are starting to 'brainwash' users to use cookies. This is often done
> by displaying a high contrast banner at the top threatening that by
> using their websit
Thanks for your reply. I am noticing that since some time ago websites
are starting to 'brainwash' users to use cookies. This is often done
by displaying a high contrast banner at the top threatening that by
using their website one MUST also enable cookies.
Is there a way to avoid this new 'cool
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:55:49 +0100
Edward Bartolo wrote:
> I am noticing that since some time ago websites
> are starting to 'brainwash' users to use cookies. This is often done
> by displaying a high contrast banner at the top threatening that by
> using their website one MUST also enable cookie
On 2016-01-19 08:10, fsmithred wrote:
I did an upgrade of wheezy to devuan jessie last week, and it was
uneventful. It seemed easier than any major upgrades of debian that
I've
done in the past. Boring description is here -
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20160114.194903.4e35c189.en.html
Am Sonntag, 24. Januar 2016 schrieb Edward Bartolo:
> Thanks for your reply. I am noticing that since some time ago websites
> are starting to 'brainwash' users to use cookies. This is often done
> by displaying a high contrast banner at the top threatening that by
> using their website one MUST al
On Sun, 24 Jan 2016 14:06:42 +0100
Didier Kryn wrote:
> Either forbid the cookies or avoid web applications.
"Self-Destructing Cookies" is a nice add-on for Firefox: install,
configure and forget.
| Fix the web. Gets rid of a site's cookies and LocalStorage as soon as
| you close its tabs. Prot
Not sure which methods you already know about but..
Another approach would be to setup unbound with redirects for those domains to
lighttpd and just have the following in index.html:
Ads will not appear or have placeholders this way, and whole domains that serve
ads/tracking will not be con
k...@aspodata.se writes:
> Reiner Weikusat:
>> Peter Olson writes:
>>
>> >> On January 23, 2016 at 1:36 PM Rainer Weikusat
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Peter Olson writes:
>> >> 5>> On January 22, 2016 at 4:34 PM Rainer Weikusat
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> >> p = buf = alloca
k...@aspodata.se writes:
> Rainer Weikusat:
>> k...@aspodata.se writes:
>> > Katola2:
>> > ...
>> >> void another_print_start(char *name, char *what){
>> >>
>> >> char c[3] = " :";
>> >>
>> >> c[2] = name[0] & ~0x20;
>> >>
>> >> write(2, c+2, 1);
>> >> write(2, name+1, strlen(name) -1);
>> >
Apollia writes:
[...]
> I think if I ever did code much in C, my code would end up looking very
> unusual and unconventional to many people, because I often like to use
> long, descriptive names for functions and variables, no matter what
> language I'm using, even Bash.
This style isn't really
k...@aspodata.se writes:
> Reiner Weikusat:
>> Peter Olson writes:
>>
>> >> On January 23, 2016 at 1:36 PM Rainer Weikusat
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Peter Olson writes:
>> >> 5>> On January 22, 2016 at 4:34 PM Rainer Weikusat
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> >> p = buf = alloca
(reposted, seem to have been filtered last time)
Not sure which methods you already know about but..
Another approach would be to setup unbound with redirects for those domains to
lighttpd and just have the following in index.html:
Ads will not appear or have placeholders this way, and wh
"Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" writes:
> Am Freitag, 22. Januar 2016 schrieb Rainer Weikusat:
[...]
>> name_len = strlen(name);
>> what_len = strlen(what);
>> total = name_len + what_len + 3;
>>
>> p = buf = alloca(total);
>> memcpy(p, name, name_len);
>> p += name_len;
>>
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 05:25:47PM +0100, k...@aspodata.se wrote:
[cut]
> ...
> > In this respect, there's no difference between alloca and static stack
> > allocations.
> ...
>
> Soo, the above is nearly the same as
>
> char buf[total];
> p = buf;
>
> Why then use alloca()?
>
Maybe beca
Rainer Weikusat:
> k...@aspodata.se writes:
> > Katola2:
> > ...
> >> void another_print_start(char *name, char *what){
> >>
> >> char c[3] = " :";
> >>
> >> c[2] = name[0] & ~0x20;
> >>
> >> write(2, c+2, 1);
> >> write(2, name+1, strlen(name) -1);
> >> write(2, c, 2);
> >> write(2, what,
Reiner Weikusat:
> Peter Olson writes:
>
> >> On January 23, 2016 at 1:36 PM Rainer Weikusat
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Peter Olson writes:
> >> 5>> On January 22, 2016 at 4:34 PM Rainer Weikusat
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> >> p = buf = alloca(total);
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> >
Good afternoon,
2016-01-24 13:55 GMT+01:00, Edward Bartolo :
> Is there a way to avoid this new 'cool feature'?
>
> Edward
At the moment a lot of the sites I visited recently ended with
sourcing a script from cookie-script.net, thus I think that writing
cookie-script.net 127.0.0.1
cookie-script.
k...@aspodata.se writes:
> Katola2:
> ...
>> void another_print_start(char *name, char *what){
>>
>> char c[3] = " :";
>>
>> c[2] = name[0] & ~0x20;
>>
>> write(2, c+2, 1);
>> write(2, name+1, strlen(name) -1);
>> write(2, c, 2);
>> write(2, what, strlen(what));
>>
>> }
>
> Why not just
Didier Kryn writes:
> Le 23/01/2016 19:28, Rainer Weikusat a écrit :
>> Didier Kryn writes:
>>> Le 23/01/2016 12:16, Didier Kryn a écrit :
I'm curious of the reason why you specify
static void print_start(char const *name, char const *what)
[...]
>>> Sorry, I overlooked
Peter Olson writes:
>> On January 23, 2016 at 1:36 PM Rainer Weikusat
>> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Olson writes:
>> 5>> On January 22, 2016 at 4:34 PM Rainer Weikusat
>> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> p = buf = alloca(total);
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > the failure mode of alloca is SIGSEGV or some o
Le 24/01/2016 11:27, Florian Zieboll a écrit :
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:11:46 +0100
Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 08:10:31PM +0100, Florian Zieboll wrote:
>
> >I had played a bit with the tiling and highly (GUI) configurable
> >"Terminator" but was bounced back to xterm very qui
Le 24/01/2016 13:55, Edward Bartolo a écrit :
On 24/01/2016, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Ghostery remains good.
Arnt
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I am noticing that since some time ago websites
are starting to 'brainwash' users to use cookies. This is often done
by displaying a high contrast bann
On 24/01/2016, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Ghostery remains good.
>
> Arnt
>
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I am noticing that since some time ago websites
are starting to 'brainwash' users to use cookies. This is often done
by displaying a high contrast banner at the top threatening that by
using the
Hi All,
First of all, if blocking and/or filtering ads while browsing the
Internet is not ethically acceptable by Devuan, block this email. If
ad filtering and blocking is ethically acceptable, this is what I have
to say.
First, how do Devuan users filter and/or block unwanted ads? I am
noticing
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:11:46 +0100
Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 08:10:31PM +0100, Florian Zieboll wrote:
>
> > I had played a bit with the tiling and highly (GUI) configurable
> > "Terminator" but was bounced back to xterm very quickly due to its
> > footprint and wrote the foll
31 matches
Mail list logo
