Re: [DNG] little tool for packaging

On 02.07.2016 11:01, aitor_czr wrote: > I'll have a look at it. But, if it depends on pbuilder/cowbuilder, i > fear that it won't work in Devuan. Why not ? IIRC pbuilder should also be available on Debian ... --mtx -- mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consulting

Re: [DNG] polkit - which one?

Le 02/07/2016 15:36, emnin...@riseup.net a écrit : Am Sat, 02 Jul 2016 07:42:37 + schrieb Didier Kryn : Salut! OK checked my wraper works with udevil. But if it comes to S> patch Thunar, Xfce4 and others, why not invoke directly udevil or sudo? The wrapper was only

Re: [DNG] polkit - which one?

Am Sat, 02 Jul 2016 07:42:37 + schrieb Didier Kryn : Salut! > OK checked my wraper works with udevil. But if it comes to S> patch > Thunar, Xfce4 and others, why not invoke directly udevil or sudo? The > wrapper was only meant to replace pkexec. udevil seems pretty

Re: [DNG] Firefox-ESR and XUL

Le 02/07/2016 12:45, info at smallinnovations.nl a écrit : On 02-07-16 07:44, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote: Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:58:08 -1000 From: Joel Roth To:dng@lists.dyne.org Subject: Re: [DNG] Firefox-ESR and XUL Didier Kryn wrote: I recently tried palemoon, found

Re: [DNG] Firefox-ESR and XUL

On 02-07-16 07:44, dng-requ...@lists.dyne.org wrote: Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 13:58:08 -1000 From: Joel Roth To:dng@lists.dyne.org Subject: Re: [DNG] Firefox-ESR and XUL Didier Kryn wrote: I recently tried palemoon, found that like Firefox, it soon enters a high-CPU-consuming

Re: [DNG] Studying C as told. (For help)

Hi, << while(*t++ = *s++); >> Using the operator priority table, ++ have the highest priority and evaluation takes place left-to-right. This increments the pointers. Next, * is 'evaluated' right-to-left. This has the effect of dereferencing both pointers. Thirdly, the assignment operator '='

Re: [DNG] little tool for packaging

Hi Enrico, On 07/02/2016 09:42 AM, "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" wrote: Hi folks, just in case anybody's looking for a little helper for deb packaging: https://github.com/metux/packaging It's basicly a pbuilder frontend, which clones git repos and runs

Re: [DNG] polkit - which one?

Le 02/07/2016 08:34, Didier Kryn a écrit : Le 02/07/2016 08:15, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : On 02.07.2016 08:11, Didier Kryn wrote: That would just be great if upstream is smart enough to preserve this possibility. The external helper is the easy thing (I've my own ready

Re: [DNG] OT: tiny widget toolkit [Was: Building w/ gtk2 vs gtk3]

On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 08:00:40AM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 02/07/2016 03:08, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : > >apropos widget toolkits: > > > >I'm currently hacking my own tiny widget toolkit, primarily targetted > >for embedded systems (for now only DRM-FB, X and Wayland coming

Re: [DNG] polkit - which one?

Le 02/07/2016 08:15, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : On 02.07.2016 08:11, Didier Kryn wrote: That would just be great if upstream is smart enough to preserve this possibility. The external helper is the easy thing (I've my own ready :-) ) The difficulty for me is packaging. We

Re: [DNG] OT: tiny widget toolkit [Was: Building w/ gtk2 vs gtk3]

On 02.07.2016 08:00, Didier Kryn wrote: > Cheers! Please go on and keep us informed. We desparately need an > independant graphical toolkit other than Gtk, and with a C API, not C++ > please (there's already Qt for C++). Yeah, that's also the driving force for me. I actually came to the

Re: [DNG] polkit - which one?

On 02.07.2016 08:11, Didier Kryn wrote: > That would just be great if upstream is smart enough to preserve > this possibility. The external helper is the easy thing (I've my own > ready :-) ) The difficulty for me is packaging. We could just maintain our own patches for that ... should be

Re: [DNG] Firefox-ESR and XUL

Le 02/07/2016 07:50, Steve Litt a écrit : On Sat, 02 Jul 2016 01:15:42 +0200 Svante Signell wrote: On Fri, 2016-07-01 at 11:23 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 04:04:35 +0200 I thought the list had declared Palemoon a reasonable substitute for Firefox

Re: [DNG] polkit - which one?

Le 02/07/2016 07:39, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : On 18.06.2016 10:12, Didier Kryn wrote: > I'm using xfce4 DE on Devuan Jessie and have removed all policy-kit* >packages and package-kit. The halt and reboot buttons of the logout menu >of Xfce do not work anymore. They

Re: [DNG] policykit - another time ...

Le 02/07/2016 04:05, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : On 02.07.2016 03:21, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: Or, for the few applications we really need, just implement it correctly. Just found out that on my Ubuntu Trusty system, after killing network-manager, I dont have any

Re: [DNG] OT: tiny widget toolkit [Was: Building w/ gtk2 vs gtk3]

Le 02/07/2016 03:08, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : apropos widget toolkits: I'm currently hacking my own tiny widget toolkit, primarily targetted for embedded systems (for now only DRM-FB, X and Wayland coming later). Why yet another one ? Well, none of the existing ones are