Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

On 23/11/2016 at 12:06, hellekin wrote: [...] > I feel like every time I'm trying to touch something, nobody cares, or > resist for some obscure reason. In these conditions, I'm very much > doubting my own capacity to bring anything worth to this community. I'd > like that it's made clear, so

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:06:34 +0100 hellekin wrote: > On 11/09/2016 11:05 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > > > > The final documentation should be done on something more permanent, > > based on the back-and forth in email. The talk.devuan.org would be a > > great place to put the

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

On 161123-13:15+0100, hellekin wrote: > On 11/23/2016 01:12 PM, Simon Hobson wrote: > > hellekin wrote: > > > >> ... nobody cares > > > > As someone who is not really in a position to contribute much at all, let > > me say that I'm grateful to all who are working towards

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

On 11/23/2016 01:12 PM, Simon Hobson wrote: > hellekin wrote: > >> ... nobody cares > > As someone who is not really in a position to contribute much at all, let me > say that I'm grateful to all who are working towards making Devuan "happen" - > regardless of the size of

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

hellekin wrote: > ... nobody cares As someone who is not really in a position to contribute much at all, let me say that I'm grateful to all who are working towards making Devuan "happen" - regardless of the size of their contribution. I watch (or at least, skim) most of

Re: [DNG] devuan-discuss is not useful, quite the opposite

On 11/09/2016 11:05 PM, Steve Litt wrote: > > The final documentation should be done on something more permanent, > based on the back-and forth in email. The talk.devuan.org would be a > great place to put the finished docs. My problem with talk.devuan.org > is when I used it for brainstorming. I