Am 06.02.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Jaromil:
> The main reasons why Devuan acts like Debian in this case is that in
> Jessie we only operate to remove systemd, nothing else changes, while
> we still rely heavily on Debian for the bulk of binary builds.
>
Ok, I see it's Debians fault for the improper
dear Jochen,
tl;dr - just like Debian does, we do recommend using Raspian on rpi1
boards version 1 to take full advantage of their rather strange
architecture.
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:18:41AM +0100, Jochen Fahrner wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > The only option I have: install from scratch
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:18:41AM +0100, Jochen Fahrner wrote:
[cut]
>
> The only option I have: install from scratch with Devuans "armel" Image.
> But this is not really an option, I will loose hardfloat, making my PI
> even more slower than it already is. So I stay with Raspbian Jessie.
>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:18:41AM +0100, Jochen Fahrner wrote:
> Am 06.02.2017 um 09:22 schrieb KatolaZ:
> > Like, for the same reason why you use packages compiled for amd64 with
> > your shiny Intel i5, despite you could have used packages compiled for
> > an i486 back in 1994? :)
> >
>
>
Am 06.02.2017 um 09:22 schrieb KatolaZ:
> Like, for the same reason why you use packages compiled for amd64 with
> your shiny Intel i5, despite you could have used packages compiled for
> an i486 back in 1994? :)
>
That's exactly the point. Nobody comes up with the idea to compile
packages for
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 06:32:54AM +0100, J. Fahrner wrote:
> Am 05.02.2017 um 22:34 schrieb KatolaZ:
> > Because that image is an armv6 + hard float, so it works
> > everywhere.
> >
> >
>
> So why are the Devuan Images not compiled the same way?
>
Like, for the same reason why you use
